4 free views left View membership plans

Banking & Financial Leaders · BFL Musrefy Award 2026

Banking & Financial Knowledge and Expertise Award

Honours experts who contributed to research, training, knowledge transfer and the profession.

Apply

How this award is scored

Evaluation
90% automatic · 10% by the award committee
Minimum score to win
70 / 100
Measurement period
The professional record up to the nomination date, with achievements and results counted over the last three years (2023–2025)

Who can apply

  • An expert, academic, trainer or researcher working in banking or finance
  • At least ten years in the sector, or teaching or researching it
  • No final regulatory or disciplinary sanction, or court ruling involving breach of professional trust, against the nominee
  • The nominee consents to verification with employers and certificate issuers; Musrefy profile data is used only as a data source, with no advantage for any membership type

Indicators and weights

  1. Published knowledge works

    Number of works published in banking and finance in the last five years of these types: a paper in a peer-reviewed journal, a specialist book with an ISBN, or a technical report or guide issued under the name of a regulator, professional body or recognised research centre; opinion articles and social media posts do not count

    20%

    Points

    • ≥ 10 100
    • 5 – < 10 80
    • 2 – < 5 50
    • 0 – < 2 20

    Evidence

    Links to publications or DOI/ISBN numbers

  2. Citation h-index

    h-index in the researcher's Scopus or Web of Science profile on the nomination date, or a Google Scholar profile verified with an institutional email if neither exists; anyone without an indexed profile records zero, which is why its weight is kept small so practising experts are not shut out

    5%

    Points

    • ≥ 10 100
    • 6 – < 10 80
    • 3 – < 6 50
    • 0 – < 3 20

    Evidence

    Link to the public profile

  3. Accredited training hours

    Hours of accredited training or university teaching in banking and finance delivered in the last three years

    15%

    Points

    • ≥ 600 hours 100
    • 300 – < 600 hours 80
    • 100 – < 300 hours 50
    • 0 – < 100 hours 20

    Evidence

    Letters from organisers or universities stating the hours

  4. Trainee evaluation

    Average trainee or student rating of the trainer in programmes delivered over the last three years, as issued by the organisers or universities rather than the nominee

    15%

    Points

    • 90 – < 100 % 100
    • 80 – < 90 % 80
    • 70 – < 80 % 50
    • 0 – < 70 % 20

    Evidence

    Evaluation reports from the organisers

  5. Contributions to standards and curricula

    Number of standards, regulations, accredited curricula or professional guides they formally helped prepare in the last five years

    15%

    Points

    • ≥ 4 100
    • 2 – < 4 80
    • 1 – < 2 50
    • 0 – < 1 10

    Evidence

    Letters from issuing bodies or acknowledgement pages in the publication

  6. Highest qualification

    Highest academic or professional qualification in banking or finance

    10%

    Points

    • Doctorate or senior professional fellowship100
    • Master's or full professional charter75
    • Bachelor's degree40

    Evidence

    Copy of the qualification or verification by the issuer

  7. Years of experience

    Total years in the sector, or teaching or researching it

    10%

    Points

    • ≥ 25 years 100
    • 15 – < 25 years 80
    • 10 – < 15 years 50

    Evidence

    Employer letters

Scored by the award committee

  1. Originality and practical effect of the contribution

    10%
    • An original contribution that changed a practice or methodology in the sector and is actually used in institutions, curricula or regulations100
    • A serious contribution that added new knowledge and is cited academically or professionally70
    • A useful teaching or compiling contribution without new knowledge40
    • A contribution of limited value10

Each indicator gives 0 to 100 points; its share of the total is its weight. Ties are decided by the indicators listed first in the scorecard; payment or package never affects the score.

Cycle timeline

  1. Done

    Nominations open

  2. Upcoming

    Nominations close

  3. Upcoming

    Judging starts

  4. Upcoming

    Judging ends

  5. Upcoming

    Results announced

Times are in Asia/Riyadh (UTC+03:00).

Results

Results are announced only after final approval.

Finalists and winners will appear here once the results have been approved and published.