Banking & Financial Leaders · BFL Musrefy Award 2026
Banking & Financial Knowledge and Expertise Award
Honours experts who contributed to research, training, knowledge transfer and the profession.
How this award is scored
- Evaluation
- 90% automatic · 10% by the award committee
- Minimum score to win
- 70 / 100
- Measurement period
- The professional record up to the nomination date, with achievements and results counted over the last three years (2023–2025)
Who can apply
- An expert, academic, trainer or researcher working in banking or finance
- At least ten years in the sector, or teaching or researching it
- No final regulatory or disciplinary sanction, or court ruling involving breach of professional trust, against the nominee
- The nominee consents to verification with employers and certificate issuers; Musrefy profile data is used only as a data source, with no advantage for any membership type
Indicators and weights
-
20%
Published knowledge works
Number of works published in banking and finance in the last five years of these types: a paper in a peer-reviewed journal, a specialist book with an ISBN, or a technical report or guide issued under the name of a regulator, professional body or recognised research centre; opinion articles and social media posts do not count
Points
- ≥ 10 100
- 5 – < 10 80
- 2 – < 5 50
- 0 – < 2 20
Evidence
Links to publications or DOI/ISBN numbers
-
5%
Citation h-index
h-index in the researcher's Scopus or Web of Science profile on the nomination date, or a Google Scholar profile verified with an institutional email if neither exists; anyone without an indexed profile records zero, which is why its weight is kept small so practising experts are not shut out
Points
- ≥ 10 100
- 6 – < 10 80
- 3 – < 6 50
- 0 – < 3 20
Evidence
Link to the public profile
-
15%
Accredited training hours
Hours of accredited training or university teaching in banking and finance delivered in the last three years
Points
- ≥ 600 hours 100
- 300 – < 600 hours 80
- 100 – < 300 hours 50
- 0 – < 100 hours 20
Evidence
Letters from organisers or universities stating the hours
-
15%
Trainee evaluation
Average trainee or student rating of the trainer in programmes delivered over the last three years, as issued by the organisers or universities rather than the nominee
Points
- 90 – < 100 % 100
- 80 – < 90 % 80
- 70 – < 80 % 50
- 0 – < 70 % 20
Evidence
Evaluation reports from the organisers
-
15%
Contributions to standards and curricula
Number of standards, regulations, accredited curricula or professional guides they formally helped prepare in the last five years
Points
- ≥ 4 100
- 2 – < 4 80
- 1 – < 2 50
- 0 – < 1 10
Evidence
Letters from issuing bodies or acknowledgement pages in the publication
-
10%
Highest qualification
Highest academic or professional qualification in banking or finance
Points
- Doctorate or senior professional fellowship100
- Master's or full professional charter75
- Bachelor's degree40
Evidence
Copy of the qualification or verification by the issuer
-
10%
Years of experience
Total years in the sector, or teaching or researching it
Points
- ≥ 25 years 100
- 15 – < 25 years 80
- 10 – < 15 years 50
Evidence
Employer letters
Scored by the award committee
-
Originality and practical effect of the contribution
10%- An original contribution that changed a practice or methodology in the sector and is actually used in institutions, curricula or regulations100
- A serious contribution that added new knowledge and is cited academically or professionally70
- A useful teaching or compiling contribution without new knowledge40
- A contribution of limited value10
Each indicator gives 0 to 100 points; its share of the total is its weight. Ties are decided by the indicators listed first in the scorecard; payment or package never affects the score.
Cycle timeline
-
Done
Nominations open
-
Upcoming
Nominations close
-
Upcoming
Judging starts
-
Upcoming
Judging ends
-
Upcoming
Results announced
Times are in Asia/Riyadh (UTC+03:00).
Results
Results are announced only after final approval.