Regulation, Supervision & Financial Stability · FRSS Musrefy Award 2026
Deposit Insurance & Depositor Protection Award
Honours systems and initiatives that protect depositors and support trust and financial stability.
How this award is scored
- Evaluation
- 100% automatic, from the data and evidence you submit
- Minimum score to win
- 70 / 100
- Measurement period
- The full financial year 2025 (or the latest financial year completed before nominations open); growth is measured against financial year 2024
Who can apply
- A deposit insurance corporation or fund established by law, or an initiative it runs
- An explicit scheme with an announced coverage limit and compulsory membership for licensed banks
- Audited financial statements for the measurement period with an unqualified opinion from an independent external auditor
Indicators and weights
-
20%
Tested payout time
Working days needed to start reimbursing depositors as shown in the latest payout simulation or actual case in the last three years
Points
- ≥ 60 days 10
- 20 – < 60 days 40
- 7 – < 20 days 70
- 0 – < 7 days 100
Evidence
Payout simulation report or the actual payout case report
-
20%
Fund adequacy against insured deposits
Net fund assets available for payout (pre-funded, excluding borrowing lines) as a percentage of total insured deposits at year end; measured as a common ratio rather than against a target the insurer sets for itself
Points
- ≥ 3 % 100
- 2 – < 3 % 80
- 1 – < 2 % 50
- 0 – < 1 % 20
Evidence
Audited financial statements of the fund and the insured deposits statement at year end
-
15%
Depositors fully covered
Share of eligible depositors whose balances are entirely within the coverage limit
Points
- 95 – < 100 % 100
- 90 – < 95 % 80
- 80 – < 90 % 60
- 0 – < 80 % 20
Evidence
Deposit distribution by size analysis from member banks’ data
-
15%
Public awareness of deposit insurance
Share of adults aware of the deposit insurance scheme in a national survey of at least 1,000 respondents in the last two years
Points
- 60 – < 100 % 100
- 40 – < 60 % 80
- 20 – < 40 % 50
- 0 – < 20 % 20
Evidence
Survey report with sample size, method and the party that ran it
-
15%
Compliance with the deposit insurance core principles
Share of IADI Core Principles rated Compliant or Largely Compliant in the latest external assessment (IMF, World Bank or IADI peer review) within eight years; if only a board-approved self-assessment exists, half of its percentage is entered
Points
- 90 – < 100 % 100
- 75 – < 90 % 80
- 60 – < 75 % 50
- 0 – < 60 % 20
Evidence
External assessment report or board-approved self-assessment
-
15%
Single customer view readiness
Share of member banks that passed the single customer view file test under the approved standard during the year
Points
- 95 – < 100 % 100
- 80 – < 95 % 80
- 50 – < 80 % 50
- 0 – < 50 % 20
Evidence
Single customer view test results per bank
Each indicator gives 0 to 100 points; its share of the total is its weight. Ties are decided by the indicators listed first in the scorecard; payment or package never affects the score.
Cycle timeline
-
Done
Nominations open
-
Upcoming
Nominations close
-
Upcoming
Judging starts
-
Upcoming
Judging ends
-
Upcoming
Results announced
Times are in Asia/Riyadh (UTC+03:00).
Results
Results are announced only after final approval.