Credit Rating & Information · CRI Musrefy Award 2026
Innovation in Credit Rating Methodologies Award
Honours new methodologies and technologies that improve the accuracy and effectiveness of ratings.
How this award is scored
- Evaluation
- 90% automatic · 10% by the award committee
- Minimum score to win
- 70 / 100
- Measurement period
- The last full financial year (2025); for impact measures, a comparison of the twelve months before implementation with the latest twelve months after it
Who can apply
- A rating agency, credit bureau, financial institution or technology firm that developed a credit rating or scoring methodology or tool
- The methodology used to issue real ratings or scores for at least 12 months
- A written methodology document approved by the methodology committee or management
- No final material regulatory or judicial sanction against the nominee during the measurement period
Indicators and weights
-
20%
Discriminatory power uplift
Difference in percentage points between the Gini of the new methodology and the previous one on an out-of-time sample
Points
- 10 – < 100 percentage points 100
- 5 – < 10 percentage points 80
- 2 – < 5 percentage points 50
- 0 – < 2 percentage points 20
- -100 – < 0 percentage points 0
Evidence
Validation report showing sample, period and comparison results
-
15%
Newly scorable share
Of the applicants or firms in the test population that the previous methodology could not score because of thin credit files, the share that the new methodology can score
Points
- 60 – < 100 % 100
- 30 – < 60 % 80
- 10 – < 30 % 50
- 0 – < 10 % 20
Evidence
Coverage analysis before and after the new methodology
-
15%
Independent validation
The level of validation of the methodology before adoption or during the period
Points
- Independent external validation with no material findings100
- Validation by an internal unit independent of the developers60
- No independent validation0
Evidence
Validation report with a statement of the validator's independence
-
10%
Actual adoption
Share of ratings or scores issued under the new methodology out of all the nominee issued of that type in 2025
Points
- 80 – < 100 % 100
- 50 – < 80 % 80
- 20 – < 50 % 50
- 0 – < 20 % 20
Evidence
Issuance system report broken down by methodology
-
10%
Time-to-rating reduction
Reduction in average time from complete data to issuing the rating or score, compared with the previous methodology
Points
- 70 – < 100 % 100
- 40 – < 70 % 80
- 20 – < 40 % 50
- 0 – < 20 % 20
Evidence
Issuance system timing reports before and after
-
10%
Alternative data types
Number of new data types used with consent or legal basis (open banking, telecoms, utilities, e-commerce, e-invoicing, tax data)
Points
- ≥ 4 100
- 2 – < 4 70
- 1 – < 2 40
- 0 – < 1 0
Evidence
Methodology document, data agreements and consent forms
-
10%
Regulatory non-objection
The methodology approved or non-objected by the competent regulator, or notified to it as required
Points
- Approval, non-objection or documented notification100
- None0
Evidence
Regulator's letter or proof of notification
Scored by the award committee
-
Methodological originality
10%- A fundamentally new methodology for the region (unprecedented model, data or calibration approach) with clear technical documentation of why it performs better100
- A substantial development of an existing methodology that fixes a specific, documented weakness70
- A known international methodology applied with local calibration40
- Cosmetic or limited changes10
Each indicator gives 0 to 100 points; its share of the total is its weight. Ties are decided by the indicators listed first in the scorecard; payment or package never affects the score.
Cycle timeline
-
Done
Nominations open
-
Upcoming
Nominations close
-
Upcoming
Judging starts
-
Upcoming
Judging ends
-
Upcoming
Results announced
Times are in Asia/Riyadh (UTC+03:00).
Results
Results are announced only after final approval.