4 free views left View membership plans

Credit Rating & Information · CRI Musrefy Award 2026

Innovation in Credit Rating Methodologies Award

Honours new methodologies and technologies that improve the accuracy and effectiveness of ratings.

Apply

How this award is scored

Evaluation
90% automatic · 10% by the award committee
Minimum score to win
70 / 100
Measurement period
The last full financial year (2025); for impact measures, a comparison of the twelve months before implementation with the latest twelve months after it

Who can apply

  • A rating agency, credit bureau, financial institution or technology firm that developed a credit rating or scoring methodology or tool
  • The methodology used to issue real ratings or scores for at least 12 months
  • A written methodology document approved by the methodology committee or management
  • No final material regulatory or judicial sanction against the nominee during the measurement period

Indicators and weights

  1. Discriminatory power uplift

    Difference in percentage points between the Gini of the new methodology and the previous one on an out-of-time sample

    20%

    Points

    • 10 – < 100 percentage points 100
    • 5 – < 10 percentage points 80
    • 2 – < 5 percentage points 50
    • 0 – < 2 percentage points 20
    • -100 – < 0 percentage points 0

    Evidence

    Validation report showing sample, period and comparison results

  2. Newly scorable share

    Of the applicants or firms in the test population that the previous methodology could not score because of thin credit files, the share that the new methodology can score

    15%

    Points

    • 60 – < 100 % 100
    • 30 – < 60 % 80
    • 10 – < 30 % 50
    • 0 – < 10 % 20

    Evidence

    Coverage analysis before and after the new methodology

  3. Independent validation

    The level of validation of the methodology before adoption or during the period

    15%

    Points

    • Independent external validation with no material findings100
    • Validation by an internal unit independent of the developers60
    • No independent validation0

    Evidence

    Validation report with a statement of the validator's independence

  4. Actual adoption

    Share of ratings or scores issued under the new methodology out of all the nominee issued of that type in 2025

    10%

    Points

    • 80 – < 100 % 100
    • 50 – < 80 % 80
    • 20 – < 50 % 50
    • 0 – < 20 % 20

    Evidence

    Issuance system report broken down by methodology

  5. Time-to-rating reduction

    Reduction in average time from complete data to issuing the rating or score, compared with the previous methodology

    10%

    Points

    • 70 – < 100 % 100
    • 40 – < 70 % 80
    • 20 – < 40 % 50
    • 0 – < 20 % 20

    Evidence

    Issuance system timing reports before and after

  6. Alternative data types

    Number of new data types used with consent or legal basis (open banking, telecoms, utilities, e-commerce, e-invoicing, tax data)

    10%

    Points

    • ≥ 4 100
    • 2 – < 4 70
    • 1 – < 2 40
    • 0 – < 1 0

    Evidence

    Methodology document, data agreements and consent forms

  7. Regulatory non-objection

    The methodology approved or non-objected by the competent regulator, or notified to it as required

    10%

    Points

    • Approval, non-objection or documented notification100
    • None0

    Evidence

    Regulator's letter or proof of notification

Scored by the award committee

  1. Methodological originality

    10%
    • A fundamentally new methodology for the region (unprecedented model, data or calibration approach) with clear technical documentation of why it performs better100
    • A substantial development of an existing methodology that fixes a specific, documented weakness70
    • A known international methodology applied with local calibration40
    • Cosmetic or limited changes10

Each indicator gives 0 to 100 points; its share of the total is its weight. Ties are decided by the indicators listed first in the scorecard; payment or package never affects the score.

Cycle timeline

  1. Done

    Nominations open

  2. Upcoming

    Nominations close

  3. Upcoming

    Judging starts

  4. Upcoming

    Judging ends

  5. Upcoming

    Results announced

Times are in Asia/Riyadh (UTC+03:00).

Results

Results are announced only after final approval.

Finalists and winners will appear here once the results have been approved and published.